An Empirical Test for Natural Rate of Unemployment and Expectations Augmented Phillips Curve Hypothesis in Perspective of Chinese Economy

Authors

  • Mazhir Nadeem Ishaq Department of Economics, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan
  • Sana Batool Department of Management Sciences, The Govt. Sadiq College Women University Bahawalpur, Pakistan
  • Rukhsana Rasheed Department of Management Sciences, The Govt. Sadiq College Women University Bahawalpur, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47067/reads.v7i4.412

Keywords:

Natural Rate of Unemployment, Expectations Augmented Phillips Curve, China

Abstract

This research study investigates the natural rate of unemployment and the Expectations Augmented Phillips Curve for Chinese economy by analyzing the data ranging from 1980 to 2020.  The empirical methodology of this study test the relationship between inflation rate and rate of unemployment which proved to be negatively significant (it proves the existence of classical Phillips Curve around 1960) in China. The study also analyzed the Expectations Augmented Phillips Curve allowing the effects of price expectations on money wages increases. Finally, the study also analyzed the natural rate of unemployment for China that was around 4.86 per cent that can be compared with the natural rate of unemployment (as prescribed by economists 4 to 5 per cent). The study suggests certain tools that will be helpful for policymakers in maintaining the conditions of stable inflation in China.

References

Ashiya, N. (2017). The Modified Phillips Curve as a possible Answer to Japanese Deflation. Advances in Economics and Business, 5(10).

Brauer, D. (2007). The Natural Rate of Unemployment, CBO Working Paper, 2007-08.

Daly, M., Hobijn, B., & Valletta, R. (2011). The Recent Evolution of Natural Rate of Unemployment. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, Working Paper, 2011-12.

Franz, W. (2005). Will the (German) NAIRU Please Stand Up?, German Economic Review, 6(2).

Humphrey, C. (1985). Barter and Economic Disintegration, Man New Series, 20(1), 48-72.

Karanassou, M., & Sala, H. (2010). Phillips Curves and Unemployment Dynamics: A Critique and a Holistic Perspective, Journal of Economic Survey, 24(1), 1-51.

Furuoka, F. (2007). Does the “Phillips curve” really exist? New empirical evidence from Malaysia. Economics Bulletin, 5(16), 1-14.

Lavi, Y., & Sussman, N. (2007). The Phillips Curve in Israel. Israel Economic Review, 5(1).

Phillips, A.W. (1958). The Relation between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, Economica, 25(100), 283–299.

Mitra, S. (2012). A Review of Services Quality Research in India, IMS Management Journal, the Journal of IMS Koltata, 4, 54-66.

Nistanene, W. A. (2002). On the Death of the Phillips Curve, Cato Journal, 22(2), 193-198.

OECD. (2009). Economic Outlook Database.

Summers, L. (2017). America Needs its Unions More Than Ever, Financial Times, 3 September.

Taiwoo, M. A., Ayodeji, A., & Bako, Y. A. (2013). Impact of Small and Medium Enterprises on Economic Growth and Development, American Journal of Business and Management, 1(1), 18-22.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-31

How to Cite

Ishaq , M. N. ., Batool , S. ., & Rasheed , R. . (2021). An Empirical Test for Natural Rate of Unemployment and Expectations Augmented Phillips Curve Hypothesis in Perspective of Chinese Economy . Review of Economics and Development Studies, 7(4), 525-531. https://doi.org/10.47067/reads.v7i4.412