Political Economy of Fiscal Decentralization and Poverty Mitigation in Pakistan


  • Yasir karim PhD scholar, Department of Economics, The Islamia university Bahawalpur ,Pakistan
  • Rana Ejaz Ali Khan Professor, Department of Economics, The Islamia University Bahawalpur, Pakistan




Fiscal Decentralization, Autoregressive Distributed Lag, Political Stability


The study examines the effects of fiscal decentralization on poverty mitigation in Pakistan for the time period from 1980 to 2019 through (ARDL) Bounds testing approach. To capture the true nature of fiscal decentralization two indicators have used i.e. Revenue decentralization and Expenditure decentralization, further the role of political stability on poverty reduction is assessed. The empirical finding suggests that expenditure decentralization has increase the level of poverty in Pakistan while revenue decentralization has negative impact on poverty. The study provides the evidence that fiscal decentralization can cater the needs of locals efficiently. Fiscal decentralization is therefore an important policy instrument for reducing the level of poverty in Pakistan.


Ahmed, M. (2015). The political economy of decentralisation and access to pro-poor social services delivery in Pakistan. Pakistan Development Review, 54(4), 471–484.

Agyemang-Duah, W., Kafui Gbedoho, E., Peprah, P., Arthur, F., Kweku Sobeng, A., Okyere, J., & Mengba Dokbila, J. (2018). Reducing poverty through fiscal decentralization in Ghana and beyond: A review. Cogent Economics & Finance, 6(1), 1476035.

Banwo, M. A. (2012). Fiscal decentralisation policy and poverty reduction: lessons from Nigeria. Journal of Emerging Trends in Economic and Management Science, 3(4), 403-407.

Bossuyt, J. and J. Gould (2000) Decentralisation and Poverty Reduction: Elaborating the linkages. European Centre for Development Policy Management. Maastricht: The Netherlands. (Policy Management Brief No. 12)

Braathen, E. (2008) Decentralisation and Poverty Reduction: A Review of the Linkages in Tanzania and the International Literature. Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation (NORAD). (Report No. 22).

Faridi, M. Z.and Nazar,R. (2013) Impact of Fiscal Autonomy on Poverty in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences 7:1, 141–156.

Galasso, E., and Ravallion, M. (2005). Decentralized targeting of an antipoverty program. Journal of Public economics, 89(4), 705-727.

Govt. of Pakistan (Various Issues). Pakistan Economic Survey. Federal Bureau of Statistics, Islamabad

Jamal, H. (2006). Does Inequality Matter for Poverty Reduction? Evidence from Pakistan's Poverty Trends. The Pakistan Development Review 45:3, 439–459

Jütting, J. P., Kauffmann, C., McDonnell, I., Osterrieder, H., Pinaud, N., & Wegner, L. (2011). Decentralization and Poverty in Developing Countries: Exploring the Impact. SSRN Electronic Journal, 236

Malik, M. H.(2008). Fiscal Decentralisation for Poverty Reduction in Asia: Opportunities, Challenges and Policy Issues. Asia-Pacific Development Journal 15:2,

Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Issues 6:4, 225–227.

Rao, M. G. (2000). Fiscal Decentralisation in Vietnam: Emerging Issues‘ Hitosubanshi Journal of Economics, 41(2): 163-177

Silas, M. peter, H.W.W, N., & Okelo, peres A. O. (2018). Effects of Fiscal Decentralization on Poverty Reduction in Kenya. International Journal of Innovation Education and Research., 6(1), 213–230

Steiner, S. (2011). Decentralisation and Poverty Reduction: A Conceptual Framework for the Economic Impact. SSRN Electronic Journal, June.

Shahzad, S., & Yasmin, B. (2016). Does fiscal decentralisation matter for poverty and income inequality in Pakistan? Pakistan Development Review, 55(4), 781–802.

Thiessen, U. (2001). Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in High Income OECD Countries. Economics working papers 001, European Network of Economic Policy Research Institute.1-43

UNDP. (2016). Human development report. New York: United Nations Development Programs.

Valaris, N. (2012). Fiscal Decentralization and Its Effect on Poverty Evidence from Panel Data on the lower 48 American States. ISU ReD: Research and EData, 8, 1–22

Yao, G. A. (2006). Fiscal Decentralization and Poverty Reduction Outcomes: Theory and Evidence. Economics (Policy Studies), PhD.




How to Cite

karim, Y. ., & Rana Ejaz Ali Khan. (2020). Political Economy of Fiscal Decentralization and Poverty Mitigation in Pakistan. Review of Economics and Development Studies, 6(2), 339-350. https://doi.org/10.47067/reads.v6i2.212