Feedback Impact in High, Average and Low Achievers’ Mathematics Engagement in High Schools’ Classrooms


  • Tahira Batool Assistant Professor, Research and Evaluation Department, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan



Feedback, Cognitive Engagement, Affective Engagement, Behavioral Engagement, High Achievers, Average Achievers, Low Achievers


The present study has interrogated the effect of feedback on different ability groups’ engagement in mathematics. The sample of this quasi-experimental research study was consisted of 87 grade nine students. The control group was consisted of 43 students whereas experimental group has total 44 students. Some feedback techniques and strategies were used in teaching during intervention. Students’ engagement (cognitive, affective and behavioral) was measured by administering a questionnaire at the start and end of the intervention. Results has shown that intervention has a noteworthy effect on average and low achievers cognitive engagement but it has no significant effect in case of high achievers cognitive engagement. Results also have shown that intervention has significant effect on high, average and low achievers’ affective engagement. Similarly, intervention has a noteworthy effect on of high achievers, average achievers and low achievers’ behavioral engagement. Students in experimental group who were more engaged and spent more time on homework and extra work. These results highlighted the importance of feedback in mathematics classroom therefore further research on components of engagement is required.


Ali, I. & Iqbal, M. H. (2013). Effect of formative assessment on students’ achievement in science. World Applied Science Journal, 26(5), 67- 687.

Balfanz, R., Fox, J. H., Bridgeland, J. M., & McNaught, M. (2009). Grad Nation: A Guidebook to Help Communities Tackle the Dropout Crisis. America's Promise Alliance (NJ1).

Bardwell, R. (1981). Feedback: How does it function? The Journal of Experimental Education, 50(1), 4-9.

Batool, T. & Akhter, M. (2019). Feedback effects on secondary school students’ achievement in Mathematics. Global Social Science Review, 4(3), 123-134.

Batool, T. (2018). Effect of feedback on students’ engagement and achievement in mathematics in secondary schools. (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan).

Kearney, W. S., Webb, M., Goldhorn, J., & Peters, M. L. (2013). Examining the impact of critical feedback on learner engagement in secondary Mathematics classrooms: a multi-level analysis. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 10(1), 23-49.

Bert, C. (2011). Maximizing student engagement in the classroom. Milwaukee, WI: Moose Moss Press.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment.Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5.

Chin, C. (2006). Classroom interaction in science: Teacher questioning and feedback to students’ responses. International journal of science education, 28(11), 1315-1346.

Connell, J. P. (1990). Context, self and action: A motivational analysis of self-system process across the life-span. In D. Cricchetti & M. Beeghly (Eds). The self in transition: From infancy to childhood (pp. 61-67). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Self-process in development: Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 167-216).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cowie, B., & Bell, B. (1999). A model of formative assessment in science education. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(1), 101-116.

Fielding-Wells, J., & Makar, K. (2008, November). Student (dis) engagement in mathematics. In Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Brisbane, Australia.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research, 74(1), 59-109.

Fung, F., Tan, C. Y., & Chen, G. (2018). Student engagement and mathematics achievement: Unraveling main and interactive effects. Psychology in the Schools, 55(7), 815-831.

Fyfe, E. R., Rittle-Johnson, B., & DeCaro, M. S. (2012). The effects of feedback during exploratory mathematics problem solving: Prior knowledge matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1094.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of educational research, 77(1), 81-112.

Irons, A. (2007). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. Routledge.

Kaplan, D. S., Peck, B. M., & Kaplan, H. B. (1997). Decomposing the academic failure–dropout relationship: A longitudinal analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(6), 331-343.

Kearney, S. W., Webb, M., Goldhorn, J., & Peters,L., M.(2013). Examining the Impact of Critical Feedback on Learner Engagement in Secondary Mathematics Classrooms: A Multi-Level Analysis. Journal of Scholarship and Practice Vol. 10, No. 1

Kidwell, C. L. (2010). The impact of student engagement on learning. Leadership, 39(4), 28-31.

Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254.

Kong, S., & Hoare, P. (2011). Cognitive content engagement in content-based language teaching. Language Teaching Research, 15(3), 307-324.

Lowder, J. (2009). More than events: Focusing on student engagement and development. Campus Activities Programming, 41(7), 18-20.

McPhan, G., Morony, W., Pegg, J., Cooksey, R., & Lynch, T. (2008). Maths? Why Not?. Canberra. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.

Mory, E. H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 2, 745-783.

Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia learning. Instructional design for multimedia learning, 181195.

Nathan, M. J., & Knuth, E. J. (2003). A study of whole classroom mathematical discourse and teacher change. Cognition and instruction, 21(2), 175-207.

Nicol, D., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2004). Rethinking formative assessment in HE: a theoretical model and seven principles of good feedback practice. C. Juwah, D. Macfarlane-Dick, B. Matthew, D. Nicol, D. & Smith, B.(2004) Enhancing student learning though effective formative feedback, York, The Higher Education Academy.

Nunez, J. C., Suarez, N., Rosario, P., Vallejo, G., Cerezo, R., & Valle, A. (2015). Teachers’ feedback on homework, homework-related behaviors, and academic achievement. The Journal of Educational research, 108(3), 204-216.

Orthner, D. K., Akos, P., Rose, R., Jones-Sanpei, H., Mercado, M., & Woolley, M. E. (2010). CareerStart: A middle school student engagement and academic achievement program. Children & Schools, 32(4), 223-234.

Peterson, K., & Davis, B. H. (2008). A novice teacher improves student engagement through goal setting and literacy work stations. Ohio Journal of English Language Arts, 48(1), 17-23.

Portelli, J. P., & Vibert, A. B. (2002). A curriculum of life. Education Canada, 42(2), 36-39.

Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of educational psychology, 104(3), 700.

Russell, V. J., Ainley, M., & Frydenberg, E. (2005). Student motivation and engagement. Schooling issues digest, 2, 1-11.

Schuster, S. (2011). Learner autonomy: A theoretical phantasm? International Journal of Learning, 18(4), 159-180.

Shernoff, D. J., Kelly, S., Tonks, S. M., Anderson, B., Cavanagh, R. F., Sinha, S., & Abdi, B. (2016). Student engagement as a function of environmental complexity in high school classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 43, 52-60.

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of educational research, 78(1), 153-189.

Skilling, K., Bobis, J., & Martin, A. (2015, July). The engagement of students with high and low achievement levels in mathematics. In Proceedings of the 39th Psychology of Mathematics Education conference (Vol. 4, pp. 185-192).




How to Cite

Batool, T. . (2020). Feedback Impact in High, Average and Low Achievers’ Mathematics Engagement in High Schools’ Classrooms. Review of Economics and Development Studies, 6(1), 167-178.