Efficiency Analysis of Public and Private Sector Schools of Multan District: A Non-Parametric Approach

Authors

  • Sumaira Batool Lecturer, Department of Economics, The Women University Multan, Pakistan
  • Fatima Farooq Lecturer, School of Economics Bahauddin Zakariya University Multan, Pakistan
  • Imran Abbas Ph.D. student, School of Economics, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
  • Muhammad Abbas Assistant Professor, Air University Multan campus

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26710/reads.v1i1.115

Keywords:

DEA, Efficiency, technical efficiency, scale efficiency, public schools, private schools

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the efficiency of public and
private sector secondary and higher secondary schools in Multan
district. We use output oriented data envelopment analysis to
measure technical and scale efficiency of a sample of 100 public
and private sector schools, using data for the year 2014. DEA is
employed to compare efficiency of both types of schools because it
is the most popular technique used to measure the relative
efficiency of non-profit organizations due to the absence of prices
or relative values of educational outputs. Moreover, it can handle
multiple inputs and outputs with great ease. As public and private
schools are working under similar environmental conditions, we
have used a single frontier, incorporating four educational inputs
and four outputs. The results of the data demonstrate that public
schools lag behind private schools in terms of CRS and VRS
technical efficiency scores and scale efficiency scores. Our study of
schools validates the dominant paradigm that private schools
outperform the state-run institutes.

References

Abbot, M., &Doucouliagos, C. (2003). The Efficiency of Australian Universities: A Data Envelopement Analysis. Economics of Education, 22, 89-97.

Asadullah, M. N. (2009). Returns to Private and Public Education in Bangladesh and Pakistan. Journal of Asian Economics, 20, 77-86.

Avkiran, N. K. (2001). Investigating Technical and Scale Efficiencies of Australian Universities Through Data Envelopment Analysis. Socio-economic Planning Sciences, 35(1), 57-80.

Bedi, A. S., & Garg, A. (2000). The Effectiveness of Private vs. Public Schools: The Case of Indonesia. Journal of Development Economics, 61, 463-494.

Castano, M. C. N., &Cabanda, E. (2007). Sources of Efficiency and Productivity Growth in the Philippine State Universities and Colleges: A Non-Parametric Approach. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 6(6), 79-90.

Cavalcanti, T., Guimaraes, J., &Sampaio, B. (2010). Barriers to Skill Acquisition in Brazil: Public and Private School Students Performance in a Public University Entrance Exam. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 50, 395-407.

Chocran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques. 3rd Ed., New York: Wiley.

Chudgar, A., & Quin, E. (2012). Relationship between Private Schooling and Achievement: Results from Rural and Urban India. Economics of Education, 31, 376-390.

Coleman, J. S. (1997). The Design of Schools as Output-Driven Organizations. . In R. Shapira& P. W. Cookson (Eds.), Autonomy and Choice in Context: An International Perspective 249-270.

Coulson, A. J. (2009). Comparing Public, Private, and Market Schools: The International Evidence. Journal of School Choice, 3, 31-54.

Cuenca, J. S. (2011). Efficiency of State Universities and Colleges in the Philippines: A Data Envelopment Analysis. (No. DP 2011-14).

Dills, A. K., & Mulholland, S. E. (2010).A Comparative Look at Private and Public Schools' Class Size Determinants. Education Economics, 18(4), 435-454.

Dronker, J., & Robert, P. (2008). Differences in Scholastic Achievement of Public, Private Government -Dependent, and Private Independent Schools: A Cross-National Analysis. Educational Policy, 22(4), 541-577.

Dronkers, J. (2001). More Parental Choice in Europe?Overview of Effectiveness Differences between Religious Schools and Public Schools in Several European Societies.

Dronkers, J., & Robert, P. (2008).School Choice in the Light of the Effectiveness Differences of Various Types of Public and Private Schools in 19 OECD Countries. Journal of School Choice, 2(3), 260-301.

Dyson, R. G., Thanassoulis, E. and Boussofiane, A. (1998).Data Envelopment Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.csv.warwick.ac.uk/~bsrlu/dea/deat/deat1.htm

Economic Survey of Pakistan 2013-14.Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan.

Friedman, M. (1997). Public Schools: Make Them Private. Education Economics, 5(3), 341-344.

Government of Pakistan (1998). National Education Policy (1998-2010). Islamabad: Ministry of Education.

Government of Pakistan (2009).Educational Policy. Islamabad: Ministry of Education.

Hanushek, E. (1986). The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools. Journal of Economic Literature, XXIV, 1141-1177.

Horowitz, J. B., & Spector, L. (2005). Is There a Difference Between Private and Public Education on College Performance? Economics of Education, 24, 189-195.

Jacobs, R. (2001). Alternative Methods to Examine Hospital Efficiency: Data Envelopment Analysis and Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Health Care Management Sciences, 4(2), 103-115.

James, E. (1994). The Public-Private Division of Responsibility for Education. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(8), 777-783.

Jimenez, E., Lockheed. M. E., &Paqueo, V. (1991). The Relative Efficiency of Private and Public Schools In Developing Countries. The World Bank Research Observer, 6(2), 205-218.

Johnes, J. (2006). Data Envelopment Analysis and its Application to the Measurement of Efficiency in Higher Education. Economics of Education, 25, 273-288.

Johnes, J., & Yu, L. (2008).Measuring the Research Performance of Chinese Higher Education Institutions Using Data Envelopment Analysis. China Economic Review, 19, 679-696.

Kingdon, G. G. (1996). The Quality and Efficiency of Private and Public Education: A Case-Study of Urban India. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 58(1), 57-82.

Lynd, D. (2007). The Education System in Pakistan: Assessment of the National Education Census. Islamabad: UNESCO, 25-6.

Martin, E. (2003). An Application of the Data Envelopment Analysis Methodology in the Performance Assessment of the Zaragoza University Departments.Documentos de trabajo, 6(1).

Ministry of Education (2005). Pakistan Education Statistics, 2005 AEPAM/NEMIS Statistics Study No. 2martin15.

National Education Census (2005).Bureau of Statistics Pakistan.

Pakistan Education Statistics 2011-12. Ministry of Education, Government of Pakistan.

Pakistan Education Statistics 2011-12 (2013).National Education Management Information System, AEPAM, Ministry Of Education, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.

Perelman, S., &Santin, D. (2011).Measuring Educational Efficiency at Student Level with Parametric Stochastic Distance Functions: An Application to Spanish PISA Results. Education Economics, 19(1), 29-49.

Pritchett, L. (2001). Where Has All the Education Gone? World Bank Economic Review, 15(3), 367-391.

Punjab Development Statistics 2013. BOS, Government of Punjab

Rutkowski, L., &Rutkowski, D. (2009). Private and Public Education: A Cross-National Exploration with TIMSS 2003. In Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association.

Sherman, H. D. (1998). Service Organization Productivity Management.The Society of Management Accountants of Canada, Hamilton, Ontario.

Statistics of Arts & Science Intermediate and Degree Colleges. Academic Year 2012-13 (2012-13). Bureau of Statistics. Government of Punjab

Statistical Pocket Book of the Punjab 2012, (2013) Bureau of Statistics, Government of Punjab

Stern, Z. S., Mehrez, A. and Barboy, A. (1994).Academic Departments Efficiency via DEA. Computers and Operations Research 21(5), 543-556.

Vandenberghe, V., & Robin, S. (2004).Evaluating the Effectiveness of Private Education across Countries: A Comparison of Methods.Labour Economics, 11(4), 487-506.

Downloads

Published

2020-07-25

How to Cite

Sumaira Batool, Fatima Farooq, Imran Abbas, & Muhammad Abbas. (2020). Efficiency Analysis of Public and Private Sector Schools of Multan District: A Non-Parametric Approach. Review of Economics and Development Studies, 1(1), 45-56. https://doi.org/10.26710/reads.v1i1.115

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>